简单,百度,在线翻译。On the review, I want to explain:Factory received the notice, a batch of goods to send out, but the factory warehouse is full, so they put the goods temporarily stacked in the warehouse door convenient loading. The company provides all the finished product should be stored in a controlled area, apparently warehouse door cannot be well controlled, such products have been stolen, the danger of being damaged.The factory that short time stacked in front of it doesn't matter, in fact this is not allowed, I to deepen the training of factory, let them know it is a serious problem, to improve their awareness of protecting the finished product.2Prior to inspection of the plant, I have repeatedly told factories let them put materials in raw material warehouse, in fact they have most of the raw material is placed in the warehouse, but in the factory before two days, they go back to a number of plastic particles, they feel plastic particles do not have to worry about damp, and warehouse has full, so the workers put them in the aisle.I think I on the training of factory is not good enough, the material is put on the outside, is likely to be stolen, lost, even if the plastic particles will not be affected with damp, but how many will affect the quality of products, factories in this consciousness is clearly not enough, they have the lucky psychology. I will once again to the factory manager training, to prevent this from happening again.I have to have this program files to the factory, but they forget to print it out, I errors in the work place is, I didn't review it again, so I'm sorry.I would urge the factory to the document is printed out, and make sure the file cover [ ] a controlled document.Before: check this file, I found the document archive period in question, so I let the factory to modify, but their clerk to save only manual correction of digital, this is not allowed, program files must not hand print out, the the auditor think this file invalid.I'm sorry, not on the document review, this is a very should not mistake, I will make them to modify and print the program files, and review it again to ensure that the correct.Some of the problems, as weekly quality goals and actual performance, training plan, inspection records, prenatal meetings, some just have a portion that does not meet the requirements, or the lack of a training record, so they relate to the link will be considered invalid, I think it is not fair to the factory.In addition, the Auditor told us, Shanghai TCPS received a report, said the factory without examination in children's products, so he must plant strictly review.I asked the factory, they are sure to reply to me, they have not done children's products, will not be, and I at the scene also did not see doing children's products. To this end, we lost a lot of points.