英语专四答案

这道题正确答案就是A。应该把she改为she is或者her。

语法点：than和as的区别是相同的部分可以省略，但是than后面需要宾格，或者主语+助动词。而as的省略是直接省略相同的部分，没有讲究主格和宾格，并且只有代词才有主格和宾格之分，其他没有主宾格之分。

(你可以看看这道题的D选项，没记错的话应该是“You have the same trouble as I”，B和D后面的形式是一样的，所以一开始就可以排除掉了。因为相似/相同的选项大概率不是答案，相反的选项可能是答案)

SECTION A CONVERSATIONS1. A. 男士让女士确定开会的日期。提到两个选择“the third week of May”或者“the second week of June”。女子回答道：目前除了the 11th of June外，这两周其他时间都没问题。故选A。2. D. 对话中女士问开会的地点，男士先提到London，之后提及另一个人建议在Chicago开会，女士对在Chicago开会的建议积极响应并提出建议，男士认为That’s a good idea，告诉对方自己会在芝加哥机场附近找几家酒店看看，故推断开会地点可能是Chicago。而Toronto是女士所在城市，Mexico City是Carlos所在城市。3. A. 男士提出周末告诉女士确定的开会地点，女士回答说自己周五不在办公室，于是男士改变了电话联系的时间：call you later in the afternoon on Thursday，故选A。4. D. 女士认同广告会给我们提供信息，但是她说“up to a point”，即在某种程度上。选项B中sufficient（充分的）与原对话内容不符。在解释原因时提到：每个生产商都说自己的产品是最好的，但最好的只能有一个，所以其他的都是在误导消费者，此外最后女士再次提及广告所提供的信息误导消费者。5. B. 男士提到广告商花费几百万美元做广告，女士对此用Is it? I think not表示质疑，然后指出广告费用已经加入商品价格里面了，所以为广告付款的是那些购买商品的人，故选B。6. D. 对话中，女士分别说到广告内容误导消费者，顾客为广告买单，可见她对广告持负面态度，A选项符合对话内容。对话开头男士就提到周四晚上有一场关于广告的辩论赛，自己必须参加，C选项符合对话内容。男士在谈论广告的某各方面之后，女士总有很多观点和评论，地滑最后男士提及：You’ve given me a lot to think about，可以推测女士对广告了解得比较多，B选项符合对话内容。只有D未提及，无法推出。7. A. 对话开始提到男士听从医院的建议，只带几样东西到病房。之后女士提到原因：壁橱非常小，故A为正确答案。8. C. 男士询问探视时间，女士的回答是“下午2：30至4：30，晚上7：00至8：00”，四个选项中只有C在这探视时间段之内，故为正确答案。9. C. 男士询问医院的其他规定，女士回答：早晨六点起床，八点吃早饭，A符合对话内容；午餐时间是正午，即12点，故B正确。之后又提到医院有“禁止吸烟”的警示牌，具体说明病房里不让吸烟喝酒，但是有为吸烟准备的特别休息室，故D符合。没有提及是否有专门喝酒的地方，故C选项无根据。10. A. 男士在对话开始提到自己听从医院建议，带的东西很少。之后开始询问女士医院的探视时间和医院规定，女士告诉他具体的作息时间和用餐时间，然后男士又问一些其他规定，女士又解释了关于吸烟喝酒的规定，可见，男士对医院的规定知之甚少，A符合对话内容，排除D。病房内不许喝酒，排除B。女士告诉他关于吸烟喝酒的规定，可见他不了解这点，排除C。SECTION B PASSAGES11. D. 开篇指出选择开国际会议的酒店最重要的事情是会议室，然后具体阐释大房间可以让大家坐在一起进行发言。小会议室可以进行非正式的小组讨论。由此可以推断不同大小的会议室有不同的用途，故选D。12. B. 第二段提到酒店的设施问题，提到bar, restaurant, fitness and sport centers。通常健身中心都会有游泳池，可见C也是提到的设施之一，只有cinema没有提到，故选B。13. B. 首段末句指出客房应该宽敞舒适，D符合。第二段提到饭店、健身中心等设施，C提及；末段提到酒店的交通要方便，A符合，只有B未提及。14. C. 说话人首句对来访者表示欢迎就提到new museum of industrial and rural life。第二句指出该博物馆展示的内容：该地区工农业的历史记录，C与原文符合，故为正确答案。原文不涉及技术发展，排除A，这里没有提到国家，故排除B和D。15. A. 在文中间部分，说话人提到该地区从农业转向工业繁荣的原因：与全国其他地区的交通便捷。之后具体提到communications的句子，如Roman Road，Portsmouth Street, canals, railways，只有A未提及。16. D. 倒数第三句提到所有展品从地方收集而来，排除A。倒数第二句指出许多地方展品有场景，例如展示印刷匠或皮匠的工作室，D与之符合，故为正确答案。文章未提到B和C。17. B. 本文开篇是Good morning, ladies and gentlemen，这是一个典型的问候语，可直接排除C和D。之后谈话人说，欢迎你们到工业农业展览馆新馆，之后又介绍了展品的内容等，可见这是一个对该展览馆的介绍，谈话人很可能是该博物馆的讲解员，故选B。18. D. 开篇指出谈话主题：safety in dormitory and personal security。第二段介绍如何保证宿舍安全：门上双道锁，出去时关上所有窗户；住在一层的人要注意在出门时或夜间锁上窗户；如果屋里有贵重物品，要给它们上保险。前三项均不全面，只有D可以概括该段内容，故为正确答案。19. B. 第二段介绍如何保证人身安全，给女学生的建议是：避免工作到很晚；避免黑暗的街道；如果知道自己将工作很晚的话，要保证有足够的钱打车回家；或者安排晚上和朋友们呆在一起。可见B是所提内容。A未提及，C不确切，D过于绝对。20. A. 文章最后一句的建议中提到a few self-defense sessions，这是指前一句中提到的self-defense classes，故A为正确答案，其他三项都是前面提到的内容，不是最后一条建议。SECTION C NEWS BROADCASTS21. D. 新闻首句提到太过新年庆典活动被暴力破坏了，午夜时分，有9枚炸弹在曼谷爆炸。下一句及后面均提到bombings and explosions，可见D正确。虽然中间提到shootings，但不是说新年庆典活动时发生的，而是“泰国最南部的三个省每天都上演爆炸、枪击事件”，与庆典事件无关，排除C。其他两项未提及。22. A. 新闻后半部分指出泰国南部三省的居民大多信仰伊斯兰教，抱怨在这个以佛教为主的国家里遭到忽视和歧视，这导致他们要求独立，建立独立的伊斯兰国家，故A正确。其他三项符合对话内容，但都不是暴力频发的原因。23. C. 新闻开头就提到布什政府在规划新的伊拉克石油政策，该项法规让伊拉克中央政府有权根据各省各地区的人口数量分配目前和未来的是石油收益，C符合新闻内容。新闻中提到了伊拉克安全问题，但这是合理分配石油收益会带来的结果，而不是法规本身的内容，排除D，A和B与新闻内容矛盾。24. B. 新闻最后提到美国政府增派军队，同时公布重建计划。指出花费10亿美元搞重建的目的是帮助提供就业岗位，推动伊拉克经济发展，B符合新闻内容。这里没有提到修建房屋，排除A。新闻最后提到repairing schools，但并不是指帮助儿童上学，排除C。最后一句提到鼓励伊拉克年轻人参与国家重建，不是帮助他们受教育，故排除D。25. A. 新闻开始明确提到联盟委员会会寻求合作的领域：industry, trade, investment, science and technology，四个选项中只有A未提及，故为正确答案。26. D. 新闻首句指出联盟委员会将寻求埃及和西班牙两国在工业、贸易、投资和科学技术领域的进一步合作。之后提到双方将讨论在九月份开会时讨论成立a joint business council的事情，最后指出该联合商业委员会成立的目的。由此可以判断a joint committee是已经存在的了，A非新闻主旨。新闻的主要内容是有关a joint business council的事情，D符合新闻内容，故为正确答案。B虽然提到贸易领域，但范围trade volume（贸易量）是新闻最后提到的细节，非主旨内容，故排除。27. C. 新闻开头指出日本十几岁的女生在过去20年变得越来越暴力了，C选项符合新闻内容，排除B。新闻最后提到日本男性对他人的侵害在转向原来与女性相关联的方面，例如通过不让别人参与谈话来侮辱他们，这里没有比较男性和女性谁更暴力，故排除A和D。28. B. 新闻开头指出津巴布韦人在选举最后一天蜂拥而至投票站，可见他们热衷投票，故B正确。A和C与新闻中的swarm. hundreds of voters矛盾，故排除。新闻最后提到一共要选举120个席位，Mugabe委任了其他30位立法者，这样他和他所在的政党就已经具有了优势，这里没提到人们对Mugabe信任，排除D。29. B. 新闻开头提到印度电信工人的罢工事件，然后指出两个原因：反对将部门改成公司的计划；反对最近任命一位非技术官员为部门领导，因此B正确。30. D. 新闻最后指出：银行、大公司和长途电话用户都受到此次罢工事件影响，只有D未提及，故为正确答案。

Should College Students Hire Cleaners? 范文 College Students, Please Mind Your Own Business! --Should College Students Hire Cleaners? Several years ago, a middle school in Shanghai announced that students would be required to pull up and remove the weeds growing on the school’s playground. The next day, what did happen was that, instead of doing the work themselves, the students stood in the shade of the buildings and the trees, watching their parents doing the work on their behalf in the midday heat. What a “spectacular” scene of doting parents and spoiled children! The idea and the practice that college students in China should hire cleaners to keep their dorms clean are just an extension of such notorious dotage and spoiling and, as such, constitute an unmistakable indication of our education being truly sick and decadent. Those who advocate and support the contention maintain that, as Chinese families get materially better-off in recent years, college students have the implicit freedom to spend their money on whatever they desire and hiring cleaners to keep their dorms clean can help students save time, which they presumably can spend on their studies. However, such a chain of reasoning is seriously flawed. Admittedly, people could spend their legitimately-earned money on whatever they like; however, they should do so only to the extent that they spend the money on those commodities and services they themselves are incapable of. For each college student sharing a dorm with 4 or 5 roommates, there are at most 3 or 5 square meters of space for him or her to tend to, including the space in the corridor. Keeping such a small space tidy and clean is a piece of cake for any college student as an adult; the labor involved in the process is minimal, so is the time required. When frugality is still a universally acknowledged virtue in the present-day world, spending money on hiring cleaners for a trivial responsibility students are wholly capable of performing themselves is simply an act of money squandering. Managing a dorm one lives in is really assuming responsibilities for one’s own actions. When the dorm gets disorderly and unclean, it is its inhabitants who should get it tidy and clean. In performing the cleaning him/herself, a college student learns to share the responsibility for managing a public space of which one is a part. The student also shows respect for the common welfare of the entire dorm. Cleaning one’s own dorm is a necessary process whereby one becomes a responsible person. What actually lies behind such a contention is a deep-entrenched contempt for manual labor and the argument that hiring cleaners could help students save time and devote to their studies is a mere pretext. Typically, college education is not dominated by heavy loads of coursework and a college student has ample time to manage his/her own affairs apart from his or her studies. Usually, those students who claim they are too busy to clean their own dorms are most often found otherwise preoccupied with playing computer games or shopping. They refuse to do manual labor because they tend to regard themselves as elites or the “chosen ones” once they succeed in entering a college. As self-styled elites, they believe they are bound for white-collar careers and thus have the privilege to stay aloof from menial work of a blue-collar worker. This naturally leads to a serious question regarding the ultimate aim of our education. No one denies the importance of learning but acquiring learning is only part of the college education. Essentially, college education is about the development of a whole person, who can apply the knowledge and the skills in diverse intellectual spheres to cope with the challenges ahead and turn one into a person instrumental to our society. Barack Obama is a living example of how a responsible person can grow into a global leader. What are most impressive about this first Afro-American president of the United States are not those impassioned speeches he has made about “Yes, Change We Can” but his readiness to serve the society through practical social work. On January 19, 2009, just one day before his inauguration, the president-elect worked as a volunteer at the Sasha Bruce Youthwork Shelter, painting the walls of the dormitories for homeless teens. This illustrates that the avoidance of physical labor is never the mark of a true elite. In the Chinese labor market, recent years have already witnessed an alarming surplus of college graduates, among whom a considerable proportion has found it hard to be employed. One of the reasons for their unemployment is their failure to acquire effective skills to solve practical problems. This constitutes a sharp contrast with the Japanese corporate culture in which newly-recruited college graduates start their professional careers not with the fundamentals of office work, but with the cleaning jobs in the company toilets. By forming their character and shaping their willpower, toilet cleaning enables Japanese college graduates to become CEOs of many influential multinational companies. This culture is echoed in South Korea where the Minister of the National Treasury worked part-time as toilet cleaner in the wake of the Asian financial crisis about a decade ago. How could we expect Chinese college students to be future leaders, on national and global scales,when they even refuse to mind their own business of cleaning their dorms? It is well articulated that “those who are ordained for a lofty mission should first be subjected to the most rigorous intellectual and physical hardships.” If learning and knowledge can “civilize one’s mind”, doing physical labor can serve to “brutalize one’s physique.” Instead of being reciprocally repulsive, those two impulses are what a college student ought to cultivate in the equal measure. Whether or not college students should hire cleaners to take care of their dorms is not a matter of money or of time, but a matter of whether we expect to develop ourselves into men of integrity, responsibility, and maturity. To the extent that Chinese college students should cultivate healthy and productive value orientations, they should take every precaution against becoming spoiled by the materialistic well-being that the country as a whole is currently experiencing. After all, there are provinces of human behavior where money cannot and should not exert its impact because such behavior is measured not in terms of money but in terms of moral values. 范文2 Recently there are reports in newspapers and internet that most of students of FuDan University who live in newly-built students flat or off-campus housing hire clernness from housekeeping services ,which brings about an intense debate between those students and teachers of the university and also among our society .Facing with the new inclination among our college students ,different people hold different opinions .Some students deem that hiring cleaners as a new form of efficiency which deserves nothing to be accused while some of administers believe that it is an pretense to escape from nsibility.Even someone think that the hiring of clean service is a sign indicating that students are becoming harmonious with society, and what causes those who hold the viewpoint of doing cleanness to think so is their tradditional opinion that colledge students is a separate group of society .As far as I am concerned,I think the argument is not reasonable enough . The main reason for my propensity for the opposite opinion is as follows . It is the reality that our college students have to cope with a great deal of events of our daily life besides study ,and which also occupy a part of our time and energy to some extent .In addition,with the rapid development of our science and technology ,our society offer us more services than before .However it can not be the excuse for us to hire cleaners,and support the idea that hiring cleaners means being harmonious with society and doing cleanness means separation from society which cannot stand to reason.Of course,as students of university ,we have achived the age of adults and shouldnot keep away from our society ,however,as everyone can see that, there are accountless approaches to get in touch with our society besides hiring cleaners.For instance,We can find some part-time jobs and participate some activity associates which can greatly contribute to our contacting with and get harmonious with our society .Maybe someone will argue that these things may account for a lot of time of them , and cause them cannot do well in their study . It is unreasonable to stand by,I think.As long as we make full use of our time and efficiently arrange our time ,we will succeedly make it. Without doubt ,numerous examples can be found in newspapers ,Tvs and internet .With the same age as ours,the main characters of such events can deal with it ,why we cannot ?Even some students spend much of time on playing vidio games and some meaningless things rather than doing cleanness by their own and join in the activity.How can we explain this phenomenon ?Are they busy with their study ?Of course they do not . In addition ,some aspect also deserves some words here .As college students ,we certainly should do everything that we can solve and cultivate the habit of undertaking responsibility and being independent .In the event which we are discussing ,we also should make clear where the money used to hire cleaners comes from .If it is earned by ourselves ,we of course can hire such services.Can such students be called adults ? The general definition for adult is ,at least he or she should be independent .So from this angle hiring cleaners is improper for our students . In a word ,we had better do cleaning by our own rather than hiring cleaners because it only takes a little part of our time and we can easily be good at our study at the same time as long as we arrage our time efficiently and make full use of it.