英文辩论稿格式

2017英文辩论赛主持稿

一场精彩的辩论赛除了离不开我们辩手的.功劳和策划的功劳，更是离不开我们主持人精彩的主持。下面是我搜集整理的2017英文辩论赛主持稿，欢迎阅读。

Debater Number 1

Debater Number 2

评委团：judges

题目 Debating Competition

开头：welcome to the debating competition of the issue

now lets begin.开始

Outline for Beginners

Following is a speech outline for (EFL) novice debaters. Too much reliance on this may make your speech inflexible; still, the expressions and the speech flow below are the basic which every (EFL) debater should keep in mind.

■ 1. Greetings

■ 2. Presenting the motion and case

(Note: of course, this is mainly the task of the Prime Minister)

■ 3. Showing the (government / opposition) “stance” (or “team line”) for the round.

■ 4. Presenting your speech outline and team allocation.

■ 5. Refutation

■ 6. Explaining points.

■ 7. Conclusion

Spend approximately 30 seconds to summarize your speech.

Refutation

Refutation, which is to point out the weakness of the other side’s arguments, can be formulated into six basic types as below:

① Not relevant: “What you said is not relevant with what you are trying to prove. “

e.g. [GOV] Korean government should abolish death penalty because Canada abolished.

[OPP] It is not relevant because we are debating on Korea not on Canada.

② Not true: “You are a liar!”

e.g. [OPP] Korean government should not abolish death penalty because it deters crimes.

[GOV] It is not true because crime rate is increasing even though we have death penalty.

③ Not always true: “What you said is not always true.”

e.g. [OPP] Korean government should not abolish death penalty because of the victim families’ feeling.

[GOV] It is not always true because peoples’ feelings are case by case.

④ Not significant: “What you said is not important at all.”

e.g. [OPP] Korean government should have death penalty because life in prison costs much more money.

[GOV] It is not significant because those who are sentenced death penalty are put into jail long years before they are actually being executed.

⑤ Alternative plan: “There is a better plan to solve the problem” e.g. [GOV] Korean government should abolish death penalty because of the possibility of misjudgments.

[OPP] There is a better solution to the problem, which is to have three trial systems and introduce new technology for investigation. ⑥

⑥ Flip: ”What you said is the opposite. It is actually our point” e.g. [OPP] Korean government should not abolish death penalty because Koran government should protect its citizens as government role.

[GOV]

Outline: Reply Speech

The purpose of reply speech is quite different from the constructive speeches (e.g. PM speech). In reply speech, you assume the role of adjudicators; to be more precise, you are to explain the reason why your side has won the round.

You are expected to do:

a. explain the criteria to judge the round

b. summarize the round focusing on issues (or “crash point”). c. Provide new illustrations to emphasize your arguments.

1. Greetings

2. Showing the outline.

3. Pointing out the failures of the other side.

4. Comparing arguments focusing on issues (crash points).

5. Conclusion.

Should different cultures merge into each other or maintain their unique feature?

Good afternoon everyone, welcome to the site of this debate. As we all know, nowadays western cultures are popular in China, at the same time, Chinese ancient culture gets bad influence. So what on earth is right attitude to different cultures ?

Ok, let's give our debaters this argument. Attention please, the title of this debate is "Should different cultures merge into each other or maintain their unique features?"

There are five phases in this debate, making a point、asking and replying questions、a brief summary、free debate、last summary.

Making a point:

Let both sides state their own opinion.

The positive/negative first debater, please!

Asking and replying questions:

Every side's second debater can come up with two questions which are replyed by the other side's first and third debater.

The negative second debater, please!

The positive second debater, please!

A brief summary:

Welcome every side's second debater to give us a brief summary.

The negative second debater, please!

The negative second debater, please!

Free debate:

In this phase, all debaters can debate freely. Every side has 4 minutes. Last summary:

After a fierce debate, let every side's fourth debater gives us their last summary.

The negative fourth debater, please!

The positive fourth debater, please!

Thank every debater !

Good afternoon, honorable judges, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for listening. I want to emphasize our point of view,。。。The reasons are as following: firstly。。。Second，。。。Third，。。。All in all，。。。That's all. Thank you.

一辩陈词格式、技巧、注意事项：一辩陈词格式没有固定的格式，主要有三部分：阐述己方观点，进行论证，总结三部分。一辩陈词技巧有四个方面：一、“立论陈词”的作用：开篇立论，奠定整场辩论赛的基础，思路，逻辑，方向。因此“立论”是每位辩手都应信手拈来的东西。二、“立论”，是建立在对辩题深刻理解之上的，一个星期，甚至半个月的辛苦结果都在一篇“陈词”中，当是精华中的精华。三、“立论”写的顺序一般是：提出本方立场，再提出定义，然后得出标准。尊后提出论点，论点一般不超过四个，最后总结。当然，套路是套路，可是我们更加鼓励创新，每位辩手可根据自己的风格写出有自己特色的“陈词”。但是，也并不是说陈词就是一辩写的，它自然是整个辩论队的精华。四、“立论”是整常辩论赛的理论核心，自然需要有很强的逻辑性;“立论”用事例一定要简短精炼，有典型性，广泛性;“立论”中每个论点都必须为标准服务，用标准衡量，更加有说服力。“立论”不得驳斥他方观点。一辩陈词注意事项：1.立意新奇确立立场时还应该注意的是：立意要新奇，从新的角度来分析问题，给人以耳目一新之感，往往会起到很好的场上效果。同时，对手对此准备不足，也会措手不及，仓促应战。2.立场无懈可击当然不能故作惊人之语，应当在"意料之外"，又在"情理之中"。这就要求大家对辩题仔细揣摩和思索，努力使自己的立场既无懈可击、固若金汤，又新意迭出，令对方猝不及防，从而使自己立于不败之地。