雅思英语作文汇总

雅思作文范文带翻译

每天使用电脑会对你的孩子产生消极的影响。你同意还是不同意?下面是我分享的雅思社会类英语作文，欢迎大家阅读!

Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on your children.

Do you agree or disagree?

Model Answer:

I tend to agree that young children can be negatively affected by too much time spent on the computer every day. This is partly because sitting in front of a screen for too long can be damaging to both the eyes and the physical posture of a young child, regardless of what they are using the computer for.

However, the main concern is about the type of computer activities that attract children. These are often electronic games that tend to be very intense and rather violent. The player is usually the ‘hero’ of the game and too much exposure can encourage children to be self-centred and insensitive to others.

Even when children use a computer for other purposes, such as getting information or emailing friends, it is no substitute for human interaction. Spending time with other children and sharing nonvirtual experiences is an important part of a child's development that cannot be provided by a computer.

In spite of this, the obvious benefits of computer skills for young children cannot be denied. Their adult world will be changing constantly in terms of technology and the Internet is the key to all the knowledge and information available in the world today. Therefore it is important that children learn at an early age to use the equipment enthusiastically and with confidence as they will need these skills throughout their studies and working lives.

I think the main point is to make sure that young children do not overuse computers. Parents must ensure that their children learn to enjoy other kinds of activity and not simply sit at home, learning to live in a virtual world.

参考翻译

我倾向于认为小孩子每天都在电脑上花费太多的时间会受到负面影响。这部分是因为坐在屏幕前太久会损害孩子的眼睛和身体姿势，而不管他们用电脑做什么。

然而，主要关注的是吸引孩子的电脑活动的类型。这些往往是电子游戏，往往是非常激烈，而暴力。玩家通常是游戏的“英雄”，过多的曝光会鼓励孩子自我中心，对他人不敏感。

即使孩子们使用电脑的其他用途，如获取信息或电子邮件的朋友，它是没有人际交往的替代品。和其他孩子一起分享虚拟体验是儿童发展的重要组成部分，不能由计算机提供的。

尽管如此，年轻人对计算机技能的明显好处是不能否认的。他们的成人世界将在技术上不断变化，互联网是当今世界所有知识和信息的关键。因此，重要的是，孩子在很小的时候就学会了用热情和自信的设备，因为他们将需要这些技能在他们的学习和工作生活。

我认为主要的一点是要确保幼儿不要过度使用电脑。父母必须确保他们的孩子学会享受其他活动，而不是简单地坐在家里，学习生活在一个虚拟的世界。

Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.

-How far do you agree?

-What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?

Model Answer:

Nobody can deny that there are certain professionals like nurses, doctors and teachers who are essential to the fabric of society, and who should therefore be rewarded accordingly. However, this is seldom the case. When we look at the salaries and fees commanded by certain film stars and actresses and people who run large companies, this does not seem fair.

First of all, not all film stars earn huge sums of money. In fact, at any one time in the UK, for example, roughly 80 per cent of actors are out of work and on top of that the number who are paid so-called ‘telephone number fees’ is even smaller. One must also remember that the career of many actors is very short and that therefore the money they earn has to be spread over many years. The same applies to company bosses.

Stating a set of criteria as to how much people should be paid is not easy. The idea of performance-related pay is very much in vogue at the moment. Rewarding people according to qualifications has long been used as a yardstick for paying people, but it is not a consistently good measure. Another is years of relevant experience, but there are many cases where a younger person can perform a task better than someone with lots of experience.

Whatever criteria are used to assess salaries, an on-going cycle will develop. This will create pressure in other areas. This considered, generally I feel that certain key professionals should have their salaries assessed by independent review bodies on an on-going basis so that they do not fall behind.

参考翻译：

没有人能否认，有些专业人士如护士、医生和教师对社会的构成至关重要，因此他们应该得到相应的回报。然而，这是很少的情况下。当我们看一些电影明星和管理大公司的人所要求的薪金和费用时，这似乎不公平。

首先，并不是所有的`电影明星都能赚大钱。事实上，在英国的任何一次，例如，大约有80的演员失业，最重要的是，所谓的'电话号码费'的人数甚至更小。人们还必须记住，许多演员的事业很短，因此他们赚的钱必须分散多年。同样适用于公司老板。

说明一套标准，以支付多少人是不容易的。目前有关绩效工资的想法非常流行。人们根据资历来奖励人们长期以来一直是衡量人们报酬的标准，但这并不是一贯的好办法。另一个是多年的相关经验，但有许多情况下，年轻人可以执行的任务比有经验的人。

无论用什么标准来评估工资，一个持续的周期将发展。这将在其他地区产生压力。我认为，一般来说，我觉得某些关键专业人士的薪酬应该由独立检讨机构持续评估，这样他们才不会落后。

雅思写作task2参考范文

在一些国家，现在越来越多的人选择独居。你认为这个现象是好的.还是坏的?面是我整理的雅思英语作文，大家可以参考参考。

题目： In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

范文：

In recent years it has become far more normal for people to live alone, particularly in large cities in the developed world. In my opinion, this trend could have both positive and negative consequences in equal measure.

The rise in one-person households can be seen as positive for both personal and broader economic reasons. On an individual level, people who choose to live alone may become more independent and self-reliant than those who live with family members. A young adult who lives alone, for example, will need to learn to cook, clean, pay bills and manage his or her budget, all of which are valuable life skills; an increase in the number of such individuals can certainly be seen as a positive development. From an economic perspective, the trend towards living alone will result in greater demand for housing. This is likely to benefit the construction industry, estate agents and a whole host of other companies that rely on homeowners to buy their products or services.

However, the personal and economic arguments given above can be considered from the opposite angle. Firstly, rather than the positive feeling of increased independence, people who live alone may experience feelings of loneliness, isolation and worry. They miss out on the emotional support and daily conversation that family or flatmates can provide, and they must bear the weight of all household bills and responsibilities; in this sense, perhaps the trend towards living alone is a negative one. Secondly, from the financial point of view, a rise in demand for housing is likely to push up property prices and rents. While this may benefit some businesses, the general population, including those who live alone, will be faced with rising living costs.

In conclusion, the increase in one-person households will have both beneficial and detrimental effects on individuals and on the economy.

题目： Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

范文：

People have different views about how much choice students should have with regard to what they can study at university. While some argue that it would be better for students to be forced into certain key subject areas, I believe that everyone should be able to study the course of their choice.

There are various reasons why people believe that universities should only offer subjects that will be useful in the future. They may assert that university courses like medicine, engineering and information technology are more likely to be beneficial than certain art degrees. From a personal perspective, it can be argued that these courses provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries, and therefore an improved quality of life for students who take them. On the societal level, by forcing people to choose particular university subjects, governments can ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the economy are covered. Finally, a focus on technology in higher education could lead to new inventions, economic growth, and greater future prosperity.

In spite of these arguments, I believe that university students should be free to choose their preferred areas of study. In my opinion, society will benefit more if our students are passionate about what they are learning. Besides, nobody can really predict which areas of knowledge will be most useful to society in the future, and it may be that employers begin to value creative thinking skills above practical or technical skills. If this were the case, perhaps we would need more students of art, history and philosophy than of science or technology.

In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for universities to focus only on the most useful subjects, I personally prefer the current system in which people have the right to study whatever they like.