14年英语2阅读答案

Text 3The concept of man versus machineis at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends tobe most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet,it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painfulside of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for eating up humanjobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’timmediately foresee. When there is exponential improvement in theprice and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immunefrom automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lotof attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, byErik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, whoboth hail from MITs Center for Digital Business.Centerfor Digital Business. This is a powerful argument, and a scaryone. And yet, John Hagel, auther of The power of pull and other books, saysBrynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable totechnology in the first place. Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S.that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave noroom for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the typesof jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is howwe have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says. It’s time to reinvent the formula for howwork is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th centurynotion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than everneed people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise theirimagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machinesare good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities. As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfeeindeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against themachine as race with the machine. In our works, we need to look at the ways inwhich machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then theproblem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate ourinstitutions and our work practices?”31.According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would .[A] easethe competition of man vs. machine[B]highlight machines’ threat to human jobs[C]provoke a painful technological revolution[D]outmode our current economic structure选B . 细节题，定位在第一句话The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as theindustrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturnsand fragile recoveries. 对象是 man vs human 答案一定要讲到machine 与human jobs 排除C D.AB 正好相反，选B .文章说现象在经济衰退和脆弱复苏是更加急剧。选B32. Theauthors of Race Against the Machine argue that .[A]technology is diminishing man’s job opportunities[B]automation is accelerating technological development[C]certain jobs will remain intact after automation[D] manwill finally win the race against machine选A. 细节题，容易，答案定位在第一句：When there is exponential improvement in the price and performanceof technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automationsuddenly become threatened.段落话题是工作与自动化，机器的关系排除B D.A C方向相反，一定选工作不利的选项选A.33. Hagelargues that jobs in the U.S. are often .[A]performed by innovative minds[B]scripted with an individual style[C]standardized without a clear target[D]designed against human creativity选D. 细节题，如果不仔细定位，容易出错，定位在第一句话：对象是creativity ，而且与之相悖。最大干扰项选C. 错在定位信息没有 clear target这个对象，Target出现在第三句话中，也可以通过非定位信息排除法排除Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be“tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for“individual initiative or creativity.”34.According to the last paragraph, Brynjolfsson and McAfee discussed .[A] thepredictability of machine behavior in practice[B] theformula for how work is conducted efficiently[C] theways machines replace human labor in modern times[D]thenecessity of human involvement in the workplace选D. 细节题，用排除法才能做对。不过正确选项和原文同义改写的不是很好。定位在最后一句话：So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “howdo we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”,作者否定了technology 排除A ,B而C是rather than 后面的内容。选D35. Whichof the following could be the most appropriate title for text?[A]How toInnovate Our Work Practices[B]Machineswill Replace Human Labor[C]Can WeWin the Race Against Machines[D]EconomicDownturns Stimulate Innovations选C . 主旨题，排除法做对，否则很容易做错。文章主题 machine 排除A D .剩下 B C,排除B machine会代替人非文章观点。————文章来源上海华是学院，里面有整套，这是我摘下来的一部分。

难度必须高了，

细微的细节考核。2、尽管整个英语二的难度比2013年要稍微难一点，但在主观题阅卷的时候，掌握的标准会稍微松一点，英语二的分数线跟去年相比基本会保持一致，应该不会有

“但”字后面是重点，也就是说:妈妈爸爸都去参加工作的副作用，即家庭风险加大。后面有讲述了以前 是怎么样的——以前是男人工作，如果男人病倒了或失业了，那么女人可以充当后备军，去工作赚钱。“可是如今”，注意“可是”后面是作者要讲述的重点，现在是2个人赚钱，如果男人和女人同时失业或者别的原因，那么家庭的经济来源就没有了，所以后面的一句话也是对应了前面的一句话“很少有人能看到这些变化的副作用：家庭风险也由此加大了。”

1、2014年考研英语二的难度要稍高于2013年，难度上升主要体现在阅读理解上面，今年的试题更加偏向于一些很细微的细节考核。2、尽管整个英语二的难度比2013年要稍微难一点，但在主观题阅卷的时候，掌握的标准会稍微松一点，英语二的分数线跟去年相比基本会保持一致，应该不会有太大的变化。

2014年考研英语二的难度要稍高于2013年，难度上升主要体现在阅读理解上面，今年的试题更加偏向于一些很细微的细节考核。

尽管整个英语二的难度比2013年要稍微难一点，但在主观题阅卷的时候，掌握的标准会稍微松一点，英语二的分数线跟去年相比基本会保持一致，应该不会有太大的变化。

英语知识运用

该部分不仅考查考生对不同语境中规范的语言要素（包括词汇、表达方式和结构）的掌握程度，而且还考查考生对语段特征（如连贯性和一致性等）的辨识能力等。共20小题，每小题0.5分，共10分。

在一篇240-280词的文章中留出20个空白，要求考生从每题给出的4个选项中选出最佳答案。

不算难。和往年差不太多

答案：Text 331. A shedding tears gives unpleasant feelings to American32. C The tear shedder's apology and the observer's effort to stop the crying.33. C producing disastrous impact34. B It must have a role to play in man's survival.35. A Emotional tears have the function of reduction of reducing stress.真题的话我忘记在哪看到了，要不你去搜索下硕考网查找相关的资料。看能找到不，我在找看看，有的话在发给你。