[case]I an exporting company with a Hungarian businessman conclude the contract, pay export fruit for goods to the acceptance of the payment. But after the acceptance of the goods by the buyer discovered fruit total weight 10%, and lack of every fruit weight is under contract, the austro-hungarian contractor is refused to pay, also refused to take delivery. Then all the fruit rot, whom to Chinese customs and handling fees charged exceeding $50,000 fruit. I export company into a passive position.[analysis]The quantity of a commodity is the international sale of goods, the main conditions of the indispensable one. According to some national laws, the number of delivery must be in conformity with the contract stipulations, otherwise, the buyer is entitled to claim, or rejection of the goods. In the case of passive, but obviously we can still be argued that, a loss. Should first found shortweight belongs to the normal way without our breach or consumption amount paid, as stipulated in the contract, we should distinguish the default, fundamental breach or not belong to a fundamental breach. If do not belong to the fundamental breach, whom no refunds and dishonored payment party, can ask for a reduction or compensation for losses, As fundamental breach, may return, but should whom goods for safekeeping, fresh goods for resale, can reduce losses as far as possible. The United Nations convention on the international sale of goods (hereinafter referred to as the convention) article 86 first specified: "if the buyer has received the goods, but intends to exercise any right to contract or this convention, the goods returned, he must take proper measures according to the circumstance, to preserve goods, he is entitled to retain them until he had to pay the seller of the reasonable cost pay him." While not care whom square and reduce the loss of the safekeeping, it shall bear liability obligations. Therefore, our company can with Hungary businessman goods loss and the expenses claim back as soon as possible.(《the international trade practice case analysis》 hubei province, people's press, 1999),