考研英语阅读2008

makes heavy reading 动宾结构出版商读这篇报告时一定会内心沉重，所以很难读下去，他们的这种读法就是“heavy reading”，意思是报告让他们心里很难受。

考研英语一历年真题及答案汇总[url]http://kaoyan.koolearn.com/20141223/849955.html[/url]考研英语二历年真题及答案汇总[url]http://kaoyan.koolearn.com/20141223/849966.html[/url] 这里有历年考研英语真题，你找下。

大。根据2022年对08年考研英语试卷调查显示，考研英语一阅读难度相对于2022年的考研英语一阅读的难度较大，但是七选五的难度较小，较为简单。

雅思阅读在雅思备考中是很重要的一部分，雅思阅读测中有各种类型的问题。不同的问题类型需要不同的解决问题的技能来回答问题以获得可观分的数。为了让同学们在雅思阅读考中更胸有成竹，下面小编就给大家介绍一下关于雅思阅读解题技巧之摘要填空题的相关内容，希望可以帮助正在准备雅思备考的同学。有摘要、填空题类雅思阅读解题技巧吗?在雅思阅读中，摘要、填空题类题目在雅思阅读题目中也是占有一定分量的，掌握摘要、填空题类雅思阅读解题技巧有助于我们更好的做好这一类题。1.先阅读答题指引部分，确定填空文章是所给阅读文章的全篇还是部分的缩写，而且还要了解所给单词是否可以多次使用。2.利用例句确定答案在文章中的位置，如能在一组题内先查看例句及一个问题，并确定例句的关键词语与一个问题的关键词语在文章中的位置，即可确定其它各题的答案一定是处在它们之间的段落内，从而缩小了搜索答案的范围，而不必通篇阅读。3.快速扫描填空文章了解其大致含义。4.判别所给单词表中单词的词性。如果为雅思阅读短语，还须确定其相应的词性功能，通过判别词性可以缩小选词目标，从而缩短答题时间。5.查看填后的词语及该填空所在句子，并理解其含义。6.将单词表中选出的目标词语与所要填空的前后单词进行相互联系比较，利用语法及词法知识确定其准确性。7.如果属于种题型，还可以利用关键词语与所给阅读文章的相关句子进行匹配。8.填空所需词性如果为名词，而单词表中并无名词，仅有形容词，必须将该形容词转换成名词形式进行填空，但这种情况并不多见。以上是摘要、填空题类雅思阅读解题技巧，希望广大烤鸭们能够抽出点时间细细的消化这些技巧，并将这些学到的技巧运用到平时的雅思复习中，只有这样，这些摘要、填空题类雅思阅读解题技巧才能真正的被你掌握。

我也正好遇到了这个问题

08年考研英语阅读理解第三篇翻译： 在20世纪60年代早期，Wilt Chamberlain是美国国家篮球协会中仅有的身高超过7英尺的三个人之一。可是如果他参加了上个赛季的话，他就变成了42分之一了。这些年来在较大的职业体育运动中的运动员的身体状况发生了很大的改变，而他们的经理人也更愿意调整队员的运动服来适应队员们更大，更高的身材。 虽然体育界的这种趋势可能蒙蔽了一个没有被承认的现实：美国人基本上停止生长了。虽然现在人们比140年前高了2英寸，特别是那些出生在已移民美国很多代的那些人，但是明显的，在二十世纪60年代早期，已经到达了他们的身高的极限。他们已经不可能再长得更高了。“在这个基因和环境的条件下，现在整体的人们已经长到我们能够达到的范围了，”Wright州大学的人类学家William Cameron Chumlea说道。拿NBA球员来说，他们身高的增加主要由于从世界各地招募到了球员。 身高的增长一般在20岁以后就停止了，而发育是需要能量和营养的，其中的蛋白质用来供给组织的生长。在20世纪初，营养不良和儿童疾病妨碍了整体的发育。但是当饮食和健康的促进，儿童和青少年平均每20年都增长了大概1.5英寸，这就是长高的趋势。根据疾病防治中心，从1960年开始，人们的平均身高，男性5英尺9英寸，女性5英尺4英寸，就没有怎么改变了。 总的说来，避免太高的身高是有很多优点的。在生产时，较大的婴儿通过产道是有更多的问题的。而且，就算人类已经直立行走已经几百万年了，我们的脚和背部继续对抗着巨大的压力，这些压力来源于双足直立的姿势和巨大的肢体。“有一些限制是个体器官的基因结构导致的。”西北大学的人类学家William Leonard说道。基因的最大化可以改变，但是不要期待它会马上就能发生。Mass州的Natick的军队研究中心的高级人类学家Claire C. Gordon确信百分之九十的入伍新兵不需要更换新的制服和工作站。她说，不像那些篮球制服，军队的制服长度很长时间都没有改变了。如果你需要在不远的将来预测人类的身高而去设计一款新的设备，Gordon说基本上，“你都能够使用现在的数据并且觉得非常地自信。”Text 3In the early 1960s Wilt Chamberlain was one of only three players in the National Basketball Association (NBA) listed at over seven feet. If he had played last season, however, he would have been one of 42. The bodies playing major professional sports have changed dramatically over the years, and managers have been more than willing to adjust team uniforms to fit the growing numbers of bigger, longer frames.The trend in sports, though, may be obscuring an unrecognized reality: Americans have generally stopped growing. Though typically about two inches taller now than 140 years ago, today’s people – especially those born to families who have lived in the U.S. for many generations – apparently reached their limit in the early 1960s. And they aren’t likely to get any taller. “In the general population today, at this genetic, environmental level, we’ve pretty much gone as far as we can go,” says anthropologist William Cameron Chumlea of Wright State University. In the case of NBA players, their increase in height appears to result from the increasingly common practice of recruiting players from all over the world.Growth, which rarely continues beyond the age of 20, demands calories and nutrients – notably, protein – to feed expanding tissues. At the start of the 20th century, under-nutrition and childhood infections got in the way. But as diet and health improved, children and adolescents have, on average, increased in height by about an inch and a half every 20 years, a pattern known as the secular trend in height. Yet according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, average height – 5′9″ for men, 5′4″ for women – hasn’t really changed since 1960.Genetically speaking, there are advantages to avoiding substantial height. During childbirth, larger babies have more difficulty passing through the birth canal. Moreover, even though humans have been upright for millions of years, our feet and back continue to struggle with bipedal posture and cannot easily withstand repeated strain imposed by oversize limbs. “There are some real constraints that are set by the genetic architecture of the individual organism,” says anthropologist William Leonard of Northwestern University.Genetic maximums can change, but don’t expect this to happen soon. Claire C. Gordon, senior anthropologist at the Army Research Center in Natick, Mass., ensures that 90 percent of the uniforms and workstations fit recruits without alteration. She says that, unlike those for basketball, the length of military uniforms has not changed for some time. And if you need to predict human height in the near future to design a piece of equipment, Gordon says that by and large, “you could use today’s data and feel fairly confident.”