2014英语二text4

谈到英语，我们很多人都了解，有朋友问考研英语一历年新题型及答案，还有人想问2014年英语二真题及答案解析，这到底怎么回事呢？实际上护考历年分数线2017呢，下面是小编为大家整理的2014年英语二真题及答案解析，一起来了解下吧。2014年英语二真题及答案解析Text 3The concept of man versus machineis at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends tobe most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet,it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painfulside of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for eating up humanjobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’timmediately foresee.When there is exponential improvement in theprice and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immunefrom automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lotof attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, byErik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, whoboth hail from MITs Center for Digital Business.Centerfor Digital Business.This is a powerful argument, and a scaryone. And yet, John Hagel, auther of The power of pull and other books, saysBrynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable totechnology in the first place.Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S.that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave noroom for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the typesof jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is howwe have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.It’s time to reinvent the formula for howwork is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th centurynotion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than everneed people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise theirimagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machinesare good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfeeindeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against themachine as race with the machine. In our works, we need to look at the ways inwhich machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then theproblem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate ourinstitutions and our work practices?”31.According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would .[A] easethe competition of man vs. machine[B]highlight machines’ threat to human jobs[C]provoke a painful technological revolution[D]outmode our current economic structure选B . 细节题，定位在第一句话The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as theindustrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturnsand fragile recoveries.对象是 man vs human 答案一定要讲到machine 与human jobs 排除C D.AB 正好相反，选B .文章说现象在经济衰退和脆弱复苏是更加急剧。选B32. Theauthors of Race Against the Machine argue that .[A]technology is diminishing man’s job opportunities[B]automation is accelerating technological development[C]certain jobs will remain intact after automation[D] manwill finally win the race against machine选A. 细节题，容易，答案定位在第一句：When there is exponential improvement in the price and performanceof technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automationsuddenly become threatened.段落话题是工作与自动化，机器的关系排除B D.A C方向相反，一定选工作不利的选项选A.33. Hagelargues that jobs in the U.S. are often .[A]performed by innovative minds[B]scripted with an individual style[C]standardized without a clear target[D]designed against human creativity选D. 细节题，如果不仔细定位，容易出错，定位在第一句话：对象是creativity ，而且与之相悖。最大干扰项选C. 错在定位信息没有 clear target这个对象，Target出现在第三句话中，也可以通过非定位信息排除法排除Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be“tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for“individual initiative or creativity.”34.According to the last paragraph, Brynjolfsson and McAfee discussed .[A] thepredictability of machine behavior in practice[B] theformula for how work is conducted efficiently[C] theways machines replace human labor in modern times[D]thenecessity of human involvement in the workplace选D. 细节题，用排除法才能做对。不过正确选项和原文同义改写的不是很好。定位在最后一句话：So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “howdo we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”,作者否定了technology 排除A ,B而C是rather than 后面的内容。选D35. Whichof the following could be the most appropriate title for text?[A]How toInnovate Our Work Practices[B]Machineswill Replace Human Labor[C]Can WeWin the Race Against Machines[D]EconomicDownturns Stimulate Innovations选C . 主旨题，排除法做对，否则很容易做错。文章主题 machine 排除A D .剩下 B C,排除B machine会代替人非文章观点。————文章来源上海华是学院，里面有整套，这是我摘下来的一部分。我这里有～用百度网盘分享给你，点开就可以保存，链接永久有效^_^，无提取码，链接：（给我点赞哦，嘻嘻～）2019考研英语真题及答案解析网上公布了么？已经公布了其实每一科考完在当天晚上就可以得到答案解析要关注各个机构的发布求2019年自考英语二的真题答案一般刚刚考过的试题在考后一个月左右能看到英语二真题从哪一年开始有？一、回答问题从2010年开始，全国硕士研究生入学考试的英语试卷分为了英语（一）和英语（二）。二、延伸考研英语（二）与历年考研试卷有所不同，它针对的是一些报考专业学位硕士不考英语（一）的学生的一套考研英语试卷。由教育部考试中心组织专家研究命题，在考研统考中使用。也就是说，英语一和英语二在研究生考试中同时使用。那么考研英语二主要针对哪些考生呢。弄清这个问题，大家要先弄清楚自己所考的硕士类别。近几年国家研究生教育在进行改革，改革方向是将硕士分为两种:一种是学术性研究生，偏重学术方面，还有一种称为专业学位研究生，偏重培养高级管理人才或专门人才，如职业经理人、会计师、工程师等等。这种分法在国外教育体制中体现得很明显，典型的如英国。我们国家以后研究生培养方向将和国际接轨，分为这两种类别。学术性研究生要继续考英语一，而一部分考专业学位的研究生将遭遇考研英语二。国家教育部有详尽规定说明，目前我国专业学位研究生包括19种，如体育硕士、汉语国际教育硕士、翻译硕士等。大家要注意这19种专业学位硕士不是都要考英语二，其中一些专业学位硕士基本上是不会考英语二的，而必考英语一，比如法律硕士。而有一些是要考英语二的，比如MBA、MPA等。具体来说，如何确定自己考英语一还是英语二呢？考生可参照报考院校的招生简章中的报考科目，简章中会明确说明考英语一还是英语二。其中英语一编号为201，政治编号为101，而英语二编号为204。还有一个简便的方法是，考研网上报名成功后，考生使用报名号登录网上报名网站，输入报名号，查看自己的报名信息就可以看到自己的初试考试科目。

谈到英语，我们很多人都了解，有朋友问考研英语一历年新题型及答案，还有人想问2014年英语二真题及答案解析，这到底怎么回事呢？实际上护考历年分数线2017呢，下面是小编为大家整理的2014年英语二真题及答案解析，一起来了解下吧。2014年英语二真题及答案解析Text 3The concept of man versus machineis at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends tobe most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet,it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painfulside of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for eating up humanjobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’timmediately foresee.When there is exponential improvement in theprice and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immunefrom automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lotof attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, byErik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, whoboth hail from MITs Center for Digital Business.Centerfor Digital Business.This is a powerful argument, and a scaryone. And yet, John Hagel, auther of The power of pull and other books, saysBrynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable totechnology in the first place.Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S.that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave noroom for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the typesof jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is howwe have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.It’s time to reinvent the formula for howwork is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th centurynotion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than everneed people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise theirimagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machinesare good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfeeindeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against themachine as race with the machine. In our works, we need to look at the ways inwhich machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then theproblem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate ourinstitutions and our work practices?”31.According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would .[A] easethe competition of man vs. machine[B]highlight machines’ threat to human jobs[C]provoke a painful technological revolution[D]outmode our current economic structure选B . 细节题，定位在第一句话The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as theindustrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturnsand fragile recoveries.对象是 man vs human 答案一定要讲到machine 与human jobs 排除C D.AB 正好相反，选B .文章说现象在经济衰退和脆弱复苏是更加急剧。选B32. Theauthors of Race Against the Machine argue that .[A]technology is diminishing man’s job opportunities[B]automation is accelerating technological development[C]certain jobs will remain intact after automation[D] manwill finally win the race against machine选A. 细节题，容易，答案定位在第一句：When there is exponential improvement in the price and performanceof technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automationsuddenly become threatened.段落话题是工作与自动化，机器的关系排除B D.A C方向相反，一定选工作不利的选项选A.33. Hagelargues that jobs in the U.S. are often .[A]performed by innovative minds[B]scripted with an individual style[C]standardized without a clear target[D]designed against human creativity选D. 细节题，如果不仔细定位，容易出错，定位在第一句话：对象是creativity ，而且与之相悖。最大干扰项选C. 错在定位信息没有 clear target这个对象，Target出现在第三句话中，也可以通过非定位信息排除法排除Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be“tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for“individual initiative or creativity.”34.According to the last paragraph, Brynjolfsson and McAfee discussed .[A] thepredictability of machine behavior in practice[B] theformula for how work is conducted efficiently[C] theways machines replace human labor in modern times[D]thenecessity of human involvement in the workplace选D. 细节题，用排除法才能做对。不过正确选项和原文同义改写的不是很好。定位在最后一句话：So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “howdo we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”,作者否定了technology 排除A ,B而C是rather than 后面的内容。选D35. Whichof the following could be the most appropriate title for text?[A]How toInnovate Our Work Practices[B]Machineswill Replace Human Labor[C]Can WeWin the Race Against Machines[D]EconomicDownturns Stimulate Innovations选C . 主旨题，排除法做对，否则很容易做错。文章主题 machine 排除A D .剩下 B C,排除B machine会代替人非文章观点。————文章来源上海华是学院，里面有整套，这是我摘下来的一部分。我这里有～用百度网盘分享给你，点开就可以保存，链接永久有效^_^，无提取码，链接：（给我点赞哦，嘻嘻～）2019考研英语真题及答案解析网上公布了么？

borrow与against搭配，组成一个较为固定的用法，表达的大概意思是“拿……做抵押”，换句话讲，文中要表达的字面意思是“地方政府要以自己存量债务为抵押向中央政府借贷”，也就是奥斯本会允许放宽地方政府的借贷上限，允许地方政府背负更多债务来建设住房。

英语（英文：English）是一种西日耳曼语支，最早被中世纪的英国使用，并因其广阔的殖民地而成为世界使用面积最广的语言。英国人的祖先盎格鲁部落是后来迁移到大不列颠岛地区的日耳曼部落之一，称为英格兰。

这两个名字都来自波罗的海半岛的Anglia。该语言与弗里斯兰语和下撒克森语密切相关，其词汇受到其他日耳曼语系语言的影响，尤其是北欧语（北日耳曼语），并在很大程度上由拉丁文和法文撰写。

主条目：古英语

英语的最早形式被称为古英语或盎格鲁撒克逊语（公元550-1066年）。古英语是由一组北海日耳曼方言发展而成的，这些方言最初是由日耳曼部落（称为角羚，撒克逊人和黄麻）在弗里西亚，下萨克森，日德兰和瑞典南部沿海地区所说的。

从公元5世纪CE，盎格鲁-撒克逊人定居英国的罗马经济，行政崩溃。到了7世纪，盎格鲁撒克逊人的日耳曼语在英国占据了主导地位，取代了罗马不列颠的语言（43-409 CE）：古布立吞语，一个凯尔特语和拉丁语，被带到英国罗马人占领。

英格兰和英语（最初是Ænglaland和Ænglisc）是以Angles命名的。