懂你英语录播网盘

我想英语不是一朝一夕就能学好的，要靠自己平时的多说多练来积累的；找英语学习中心也是可以啦 我就感觉.好.去年上课的ABC天卞英语还行 那里有针对不同的人开设的课 有多种选择；英语提高离不开听、说、读、写，背个方面听：平时听英文电台，看美剧，英文歌，听自己的录音都行说：多去说，参加英语角，和老外说，不要怕说错，大胆的说读；每天早晨是阅读最好时候，浪了等于浪一天的学习时间写：尽量每个题材都去写，特别是一些应用类的题材 背：单词是基础，平时利用一些碎时间和方法来背单词，增加自己的词汇量

《英语语法教学视频》百度网盘高清资源免费在线观看

链接:

作品相关介绍：

新东方高中核心英语语法课程奇速英语（10讲）

Okay, Top Tip #2: How to pick the perfect partner. So let's imagine then that you're a roaring success on the dating scene. But the question arises of how do you then convert that success into longer-term happiness and in particular, how do you decide when is the right time to settle down? Now generally, it's not advisable to just cash in and marry the first person who comes along and shows you any interest at all. But, equally, you don't really want to leave it too long if you want to maximize your chance of long-term happiness. As my favorite author, Jane Austen, puts it, "An unmarried woman of seven and twenty can never hope to feel or inspire affection again." (Laughter) Thanks a lot, Jane. What do you know about love? So the question is then, how do you know when is the right time to settle down given all the people that you can date in your lifetime? Thankfully, there's a rather delicious bit of mathematics that we can use to help us out here, called optimal stopping theory. So let's imagine then, that you start dating when you're 15 and ideally, you'd like to be married by the time that you're 35. And there's a number of people that you could potentially date across your lifetime, and they'll be at varying levels of goodness. Now the rules are that  once  you cash in and get married, you can't look  ahead  to see what you  could  have had, and  equally , you can't go  back  and change your mind. In my experience at least, I find that typically people don't much like being recalled years after being passed up for somebody else, or that's just me. So the math says then that what you should do in the first 37 percent of your dating window, you should just reject everybody as serious marriage potential. (Laughter) And then, you should pick the next person that comes along that is better than everybody that you've seen before. So here's the example. Now if you do this, it can be mathematically proven, in fact, that this is the best possible way of maximizing your chances of finding the perfect partner. Now unfortunately, I have to tell you that this method does come with some risks. For instance, imagine if your perfect partner appeared during your first 37 percent. Now, unfortunately, you'd have to reject them. (Laughter) Now, if you're following the maths, I'm afraid no one else comes along that's better than anyone you've seen before, so you have to go on rejecting everyone and die alone. (Laughter) Probably surrounded by cats nibbling at your remains. What issue does Fry's 2nd tip address? >how to find the right person to settle down with. What risk is there for people who reject the first 37% of potential partners they meet? >the first 37% of potential partners might include the most ideal partner. What is a common issue among people looking to settle down? > They don't want to settle down too early or too late. To convert something means... > to change it. To have a deep affection for someone means to... >have strong feelings or love for them. It's not advisable to just cash in and marry the first person who comes along and shows you any interest at all. But, equally, you don't really want to leave it too long if you want to maximize your chance of long-term happiness. Okay, another risk is, let's imagine, instead, that the first people that you dated in your first 37 percent are just incredibly dull, boring, terrible people. Now, that's okay, because you're in your rejection phase, so thats fine, you can reject them. But then imagine, the next person to come along is just marginally less boring, dull and terrible than everybody that you've seen before. Now, if you are following the maths, I'm afraid you have to marry them and end up in a relationship which is, frankly, suboptimal. Sorry about that. But I do think that there's an opportunity here for Hallmark to cash in on and really cater for this market. A Valentine's Day card like this. (Laughter) "My darling husband, you are marginally less terrible than the first 37 percent of people I dated." It's actually more romantic than I normally manage. Okay, so this method doesn't give you a 100 percent  success  rate, but there's no other  possible  strategy that can do any  better . And  actually , in the wild, there are certain types of fish which follow and  employ  this  exact  strategy. So they reject every possible suitor that turns up in the first 37 percent of the mating season, and then they pick the next fish that comes along after that window that's, I don't know, bigger and burlier than all of the fish that they've seen before. I also think that subconsciously, humans, we do sort of do this anyway. We give ourselves a little bit of time to play the field, get a feel for the marketplace or whatever when we're young. And then we only start looking seriously at potential marriage candidates once we hit our mid-to-late 20s. I think this is conclusive proof, if ever it were needed, that everybody's brains are prewired to be just a little bit mathematical. Questions Why is rejecting the first 37% of potential parterners is useful strategy despite the risks? >it offers the highest chance of finding a suitable partner. What proof does Fry offer to show that human brains are mathematical? >we use our past dating experiences to evaluate potential long-term partners. If the first 37 percent of people you date are undesirable and you reject them, what does the math say you should do next? >You should marry the next person who comes along, even if they are suboptimal. How does Fry's example about fish support her claim?  >It shows that rejecting one's first potential partners is a natural phenomenon. A phase is... > a stage in a process. To play field means... >to become romantically involved with a mumber of partners. To do something subconsciously means... >to do without awareness. If something is suboptimal, it is... >below the highest level or standard. (1)A risk is that the first people that you dated in your first 37 percent are just incredibly dull, boring, terrible people.  (2)That's okay, because you're in your rejection phase, so you can reject them. (3)But then imagine, the next person to come along is just marginally less boring, dull and terrible than everybody that you've seen before. (4)Now, if you are following the maths, I'm afraid you have to marry them and end up in a relationship which is, frankly, suboptimal. It can be mathematically proven that this is the best way to find the perfect partner.  He question arises of how do you convert that success into longer-term happiness and in particular, how do you decide when is the right time to settle down? I think this is conclusive proof  that everybody's brains are prewired to be just a little bit mathematical. It offers the highest chance of finding a suitable partner. We use our past dating experiences to evaluate potential long-term partners. There's a number of people that you could potentially date across your lifetime. How do you know when is the right time to settle down given all the people that you can date in your lifetime? This method doesn't give you a 100 percent success rate, but there's no other possible strategy that can do any better.

《初中英语》百度网盘资源免费下载

链接:

英语|初中英语|5. 动词|4. 句子|3. 时态和语态|2. 数词、冠词、介词和形容词|1. 名词和代词|9. 名词易混点（二）.mp4|8. 名词易混点（一）.mp4|7. of所有格.mp4|6. ‘s所有格.mp4|5. 不可数名词.mp4|4. 名词变复数奇葩篇.mp4|3. 名词变复数（二）.mp4|25. 代词易混点（七）.mp4

新东方高中核心英语语法课程奇速英语（10讲）（高清视频）

链接:  

新东方高中核心英语语法课程奇速英语（10讲）百度网盘

别人说的再多也没用，还不如亲身体验来的实际我个人比较喜欢老外one to one我现在上的价格也不贵！